Youth LIGHT
Youth LIGHT was a study to address critical gaps in research on HIV/AIDS prevention with high risk youth, offering an opportunity to shift patterns of sexual risk behaviors among delinquent youth at risk of becoming HIV seropositive adults. An intervention with established efficacy for high risk adults, Project LIGHT, was adapted for high risk adolescents. Youth LIGHT tested the hypothesis that a computerized version of Project LIGHT would be as efficacious as the interpersonal, small-group delivery of the intervention in reducing the sexual risk behaviors of delinquent youths. Youth LIGHT was intended to appeal to youth by changing the traditional methods for teaching and sharing information while getting them to think about their HIV and STI risk behaviors. The study was conducted in partnership with the Los Angeles County Office of Education, and the Juvenile Division of the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles.
Targeted Risk Group:
Male and female at-risk youth between 14-21 years old, attending LA County alternative education high schools located in the community and in juvenile hall camps.
Interventions, Training Manuals, etc. :
[download id=”11937″]
| Session 1: Introductory education/preparedness – basic information about HIV/AIDS; motivation for self-protection | |
|
|
| Session 2: Identifying triggers – personal vulnerability; identifying personal antecedents to risk behavior | |
|
|
| Session 3: Controlling triggers – problem solving and cognitive self-instruction | |
|
|
| Session 4: Condom skills – practice use of male and female condom; needle cleaning skills | |
|
|
| Session 5/6: Protecting myself– assertive communication | |
|
|
| Session 6: Maintenance and relapse prevention – reinforcement of previous skills and advocacy | |
|
|
To illustrate the operations of the computer intervention, we have constructed a table which illustrates the parallel structure between the small group Project Light, and Project Light delivered via computer.
Research Methods:
Students aged 14 to 18 years attending 22 alternative education high schools located in the community and in juvenile hall camps were assessed at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months. The baseline and follow-up assessments required about 1.5-hour to complete. Each recruitment school was randomized into one of three study conditions: 1) Interpersonal Intervention, 2) Computerized Intervention or, 3) Control. Students attending the same school received the same intervention condition.
Local Significance:
Results from the pilot of this study support the use of computers as a tool for HIV prevention. Youths receiving the computerized intervention were successful in reducing their sexual risk behaviors.
International Significance:
Computerized interventions, which are relatively easy to implement and sustain, appear to be a potentially effective means of promoting reductions in HIV-related sexual risk behaviors. Interactive computer programs may help youths learn skills to prevent HIV infection and instill in these youths the self-efficacy to apply these new skills. These attributes may be particularly useful in international settings where concerns of cost-effectiveness and ease in dissemination are of paramount importance.
Start of Project:
